🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.